West v. Kind et al
| Rufus West and Muslim Mansa Lutalo Iyapo |
| John Kind, Lt Cole, Cindy O'Donnell and John Does |
| 2:2022cv00178 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 4/12/22 that West's claims against ODonnell and the John Does are DISMISSED. Kind and Cole shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within sixty days of receiving electronic notice of this order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
|
| FILING FEE Received: $402.00, receipt number GB4689-5937. (mac) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Rufus West. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (tlf) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from the Clerk to Rufus West requesting that he submit the consent/refusal form for Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph within 21 days. Plaintiff must also submit either the filing fee or his request to proceed without prepayment and his six-month certified trust account statement.(tlf) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Rufus West. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(tlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
