Johnson v. Kenosha Unified School District et al
| Sherry Johnson |
| Kenosha Unified School District, Shana R Lewis and Sue Savaglio-Jarvis |
| 2:2022cv00269 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sue Savaglio-Jarvis - Waiver sent on 3/28/2022. (Hitchcock Cross, Ben) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kenosha Unified School District - Waiver sent on 3/28/2022. (Hitchcock Cross, Ben) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shana R Lewis - Waiver sent on 3/28/2022. (Hitchcock Cross, Ben) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole M Ways on behalf of Kenosha Unified School District, Sue Savaglio-Jarvis. Attorney(s) appearing: Nicole M. Ways (Ways, Nicole) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Brett H Ludwig. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (kah) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kenosha Unified School District, Sue Savaglio-Jarvis. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Lubinsky, Lori) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to defendants Kenosha Unified School District, Sue Savaglio-Jarvis requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. (amb) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kenosha Unified School District, Sue Savaglio-Jarvis.(Lubinsky, Lori) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Lori M Lubinsky on behalf of Kenosha Unified School District, Sue Savaglio-Jarvis. Attorney(s) appearing: Lori M. Lubinsky (Lubinsky, Lori) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Sherry Johnson. (Hitchcock Cross, Ben) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: Addresses removed from party names - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. The description of the attachment to the complaint contains duplicate text. Most documents on the drop-down list do not need further description. If you want to add a description, do not retype the same words into the description box. For example, if you choose Summons from the drop-down list then you may use the description box to the type in the name of the party to whom the summons is directed but you do not need to type the word summons. This document does not need to be re-filed. Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Sherry Johnson by Sherry Johnson. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4054538) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Hitchcock Cross, Ben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
