Ferguson v. State of Wisconsin et al
| Charles E Ferguson |
| State of Wisconsin, Bruce Landgraff, Gary Byias, Judge Ralph Gorenstein, State of Georgia, Paul Howard and Atlanta Police Department |
| 2:2022cv00316 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 LETTER from plaintiff re: exhibits. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(amb) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Charles E Ferguson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting the plaintiff sign the enclosed complaint and file it with the Clerk's Office as soon as possible. (blr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Charles E Ferguson. (blr) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT (unsigned) against All Defendants filed by Charles E Ferguson. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Judgment of Conviction, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(blr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
