Gardner v. Simm Associates Inc.
| Gary Gardner |
| Simm Associates Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00360 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by Gary Gardner. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| As of 3/31/2022, all Defendants in this matter have appeared and submitted answers. The parties are ORDERED to submit a joint Rule 26 plan by 5/2/2022. The Court will then issue a written trial scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(A). The parties should contact chambers if they have any questions. (cc: all counsel) (ld) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE Statement by Simm Associates Inc.. (Perr, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Simm Associates Inc.. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Perr, Richard) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (lz) |
| SECOND NOTICE from the clerk to ALL PARTIES requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin be filed within 14 days; the form is available #here. (lz) |
| SECOND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement should have been filed. Please file your disclosure statement within 7 days. (lz) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by Simm Associates Inc..(Perr, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Simm Associates Inc. from Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Case Number: 2021-cv-007226 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4069431) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perr, Richard) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gardner v. Simm Associates Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gary Gardner | |
| Represented By: | Ben James Slatky |
| Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
| Represented By: | John D Blythin |
| Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Simm Associates Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Richard J Perr, I |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
