Triple Crown, Inc v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co
Triple Crown, Inc., d/b/a Buck Bradley, LLC and Triple Crown Inc doing business as Buck Bradley LLC |
Auto-Owners Insurance Co |
2:2022cv00370 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/21/2022 re #8 Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines. The court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and ORDERS that all deadlines in this case are STAYED until the Wisconsin Supreme Court issues a decision in Colectivo Coffee Roasters, et al. v. Society Insurance, Case No. 2021AP000463. The court ORDERS that the parties shall notify the court when that decision has been issued. The court further ORDERS that if a decision has not been issued by June 1, 2022, the parties shall file a status report advising the court of their proposed next steps. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 12 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Defendants. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Vandamme, Amy) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED Proposed Order Granting Motion to Stay All Deadlines filed by Triple Crown Inc. (Strohbehn, Christopher) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE Statement by Triple Crown Inc. (Strohbehn, Christopher) |
Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Triple Crown Inc. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Strohbehn, Christopher) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay All Deadlines by Triple Crown Inc. (Strohbehn, Christopher) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/4/2022. By end of day 4/22/2022, plaintiff shall file either amended complaint or response to defendant's motion to dismiss. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Amy L. Vandamme (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Vandamme Declaration, #2 Exhibit B to Vandamme Declaration, #3 Exhibit C to Vandamme Declaration, #4 Exhibit D to Vandamme Declaration, #5 Exhibit E to Vandamme Declaration, #6 Exhibit F Vandamme Declaration)(Vandamme, Amy) |
Filing 5 BRIEF in Support filed by All Defendants re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) . (Vandamme, Amy) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by All Defendants. (Vandamme, Amy) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by All Defendants. (Vandamme, Amy) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Amy L. Vandamme (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Vandamme Declaration, #2 Exhibit B to Vandamme Declaration, #3 Exhibit C to Vandamme Declaration, #4 Exhibit D to Vandamme Declaration)(Vandamme, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Auto-Owners Insurance Co from Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, Case Number: 22-CV-001155 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4072721) (Attachments: #1 Removal Notice Exhibit A to Notice of Removal)(Vandamme, Amy) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2022: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jcl). |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.