Otis v. Zurich America Insurance Company et al
| Jill Otis and Jill L Otis |
| Zurich America Insurance Company, Kwik Trip Inc, Travis Hoover and Debera B Manger |
| 2:2022cv00399 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 4/6/2022. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Otis' motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF no. #3 ) be denied as moot, and that her complaint (ECF no. #1 ) be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Judge Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(amb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Jill Otis. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jill Otis. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jill Otis. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
