Kramer v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Jonathon Michael Kramer |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| 2:2022cv00442 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 4/28/2022. (blr) |
| Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/26/2022. (blr) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jonathon Michael Kramer. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (blr) |
| Filing 7 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 06/13/2022;Plaintiff's brief due 07/23/22;Defendant's response due 09/01/22;Plaintiff's reply due 09/16/22. (cc: all counsel and mailed to plaintiff) (kmr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Godfrey, Jean) |
| Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (asc) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/13/22 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(KMR)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (blr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Jonathon Michael Kramer. (blr) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Jonathon Michael Kramer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Notice of Appeals Council Action (02.18.22))(blr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kramer v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathon Michael Kramer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Jean Marie Godfrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
