McCoy v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court
| James Cortez McCoy |
| Milwaukee County Circuit Court |
| 2:2022cv00609 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/13/22. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(kmr) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/13/22. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect from the plaintiff's prison trust account the $345.63 balance of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and warden)(kmr)
|
| Case Terminated (jcl) |
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $4.37, receipt number MK4689-#89806. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (bx) |
| Filing 7 LETTER from the Clerk to James Cortez McCoy regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/6/22. IT IS ORDERED that on or before 6/28/22 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $4.37 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and warden)(kmr)
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by James Cortez McCoy. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (cmb) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James Cortez McCoy. (cmb) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. Mailed. (cmb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by James Cortez McCoy. (cmb) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with jury demand filed against Milwaukee County Circuit Court by James Cortez McCoy. (cmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCoy v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Cortez McCoy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Milwaukee County Circuit Court | |
| Represented By: | Milwaukee County - 550, 555, 2241 |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
