Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan et al v. Advocate Aurora Health, Inc. et al
| Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan and Uriel Pharmacy, Inc. |
| Advocate Aurora Health, Inc., Aurora Health Care, Inc., Advocate Aurora Health Inc and Aurora Health Care Inc |
| 2:2022cv00610 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Jamie Crooks on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Attorney(s) appearing: Jamie Crooks (Crooks, Jamie) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/22/22 GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer due by 9/12/22. (cc: all counsel)(kmr)
|
| Filing 14 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Defendants. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Oesch, Nathan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Anne Johnson Palmer on behalf of Advocate Aurora Health, Inc., Aurora Health Care Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: Anne Johnson Palmer (Johnson Palmer, Anne) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Jane E Willis on behalf of Advocate Aurora Health, Inc., Aurora Health Care Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: Jane E. Willis (Willis, Jane) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel E Conley on behalf of All Defendants. Attorney(s) appearing: Daniel E. Conley (Conley, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J Splitek on behalf of All Defendants. Attorney(s) appearing: Matthew J. Splitek (Splitek, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Oesch, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE Statement by All Defendants. (Oesch, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan J Oesch on behalf of All Defendants. Attorney(s) appearing: Nathan J. Oesch (Oesch, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Aurora Health Care Inc - Waiver sent on 6/13/2022. (St John, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Advocate Aurora Health, Inc. - Waiver sent on 6/13/2022. (St John, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan, Uriel Pharmacy, Inc.. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (St John, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan, Uriel Pharmacy, Inc.. (St John, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan, Uriel Pharmacy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons in a Civil Action - Aurora Health Care, Inc.)(St John, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Advocate Aurora Health, Inc., Aurora Health Care, Inc. by Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan, Uriel Pharmacy, Inc.. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4122748)(St John, Kevin) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/24/2022: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jcl). |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
