United States of America v. Peters et al
| United States of America |
| Mark D Peters, Rosemary L. Peters and Rosemary L Peters |
| 2:2022cv00621 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (kah) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by United States of America. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Kirby, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Rosemary L Peters served on 6/11/2022. (Kirby, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Mark D Peters served on 6/4/2022. (Kirby, Elizabeth) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Kirby, Elizabeth) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
