Ortiz v. Benchmark Abbey LLC
| J.Anthony Ortiz and J Anthony Ortiz |
| Benchmark Abbey, LLC and Benchmark Abbey LLC |
| 2:2022cv00801 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benchmark Abbey LLC - Waiver sent on 7/13/2022. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by J Anthony Ortiz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Luzi, Scott) |
| Summons Issued as to Benchmark Abbey LLC. (amb) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott S Luzi on behalf of J.Anthony Ortiz. Attorney(s) appearing: Scott S. Luzi, James A. Walcheske, David M. Potteiger (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by J.Anthony Ortiz. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Benchmark Abbey, LLC by J.Anthony Ortiz. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4160077) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Luzi, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
