Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Werk Investments LLC et al
Joe Hand Promotions Inc |
Werk Investments LLC doing business as Points View Boite and Marcos Ramos-Garcia |
2:2022cv00921 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
J P Stadtmueller |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Janis, Ryan) |
Filing 3 PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge JP Stadtmueller on 8/12/2022. (cc: all counsel) (ats) |
Summons Issued as to Marcos Ramos-Garcia, Werk Investments LLC. (bx) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (Janis, Ryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marcos Ramos-Garcia, Werk Investments LLC by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4183766) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Janis, Ryan) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.