Ball v. United States Department of Education et al
Christopher Ball |
United States Department of Education, Nelnet Inc, Transunion Intermediate Holding Company Inc, Experian Information Solutions Inc, Equifax Inc and Innovis Data Solutions Inc |
2:2022cv00954 |
August 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Christopher Ball. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jcl) |
Filing 4 Corrected AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Christopher Ball.(jcl) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/24/22 GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. IT IS ADDITIONALLY ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), that the U.S. Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the complaint, a waiver of service form and/or the summons, and this order upon defendants. (cc: all counsel, usms, and mailed to pro se party)(kmr) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Christopher Ball. (edr) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Christopher Ball. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin. Jury Demand. (edr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.