Rodgers v. Cross Roads Dual Diagnosis Facility et al
Plaintiff: Autumn Charlene Rodgers
Defendant: Cross Roads Dual Diagnosis Facility, Department of Corrections and Cindy
Case Number: 2:2022cv00993
Filed: August 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen C Dries
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Filing 10 LETTER from plaintiff re: status of case. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(amb)
October 27, 2022 Filing 9 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 10/27/2022. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(amb)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 10/27/2022 DENYING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) because the complaint fails to state a claim. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(amb)
October 21, 2022 Filing 7 LETTER from plaintiff re: address. (amb)
October 5, 2022 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Autumn Charlene Rodgers. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lz)
September 29, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address as to Autumn Charlene Rodgers to: KCDC. (kah)
September 29, 2022 Copy of #4 Letter and Consent Form RESENT via U.S. Mail to Autumn Charlene Rodgers at KCDC. (kah)
September 21, 2022 Filing 4 SECOND LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 14 days. (amb)
August 30, 2022 Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (edr)
August 29, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Autumn Charlene Rodgers. (edr)
August 29, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Autumn Charlene Rodgers. (edr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodgers v. Cross Roads Dual Diagnosis Facility et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Autumn Charlene Rodgers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cross Roads Dual Diagnosis Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cindy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?