Hennings v. Boushka et al
Plaintiff: Davonci Hennings
Defendant: Boushka and Diana Simmons
Case Number: 2:2022cv00999
Filed: August 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by District Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/27/22 re #9 Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee. The motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff must pay the $13.08 initial partial filing fee, as directed in the previous order, by November 2, 2022. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(kmr)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time by Davonci Hennings. (bx)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER from the Clerk to Davonci Hennings regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/12/22 that on or before 10/3/22 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $13.08 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and warden)(kmr)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DISREGARD DOCKETED IN ERROR CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Davonci Hennings (cmb) Modified on 9/12/2022 (cmb).
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Davonci Hennings. (cmb)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Davonci Hennings. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (cmb)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. Mailed. (cmb)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Davonci Hennings. (cmb)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with jury demand filed against All Defendants by Davonci Hennings. (cmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hennings v. Boushka et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davonci Hennings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boushka
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diana Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?