Bahar v. Mayorkas et al
| Samer Bahar |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Antony Blinken and Ur M Jaddou |
| 2:2022cv01005 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (bx) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Samer Bahar (Attachments: #1 Summons Antony Blenkin, #2 Summons Attorney General, #3 Summons Ur Jaddou, #4 Summons U.S. Attorney)(Ibrahim, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mohammed Ibrahim on behalf of Samer Bahar. Attorney(s) appearing: Mohammed Ibrahim (Ibrahim, Mohammed) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas by Samer Bahar. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4199718) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ibrahim, Mohammed) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
