McNulty v. Glorioso et al
Plaintiff: Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant: Ted Glorioso and Doe Security Guard
Case Number: 2:2022cv01139
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Brett H Ludwig
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/28/22. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 10/28/22 that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 be DENIED as moot. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
October 20, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff Ned Charles McNulty, II.(vkb)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 10/12/22 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. If McNulty wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. An amended complaint must be filed with the Court on or before November 11, 2022. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
October 7, 2022 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Ned Charles McNulty, II. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (cmb)
September 29, 2022 Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days (vkb)
September 29, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee filed by plaintiff Ned Charles McNulty, II (vkb)
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Ned Charles McNulty, II (Attachment(s): #1 Envelope) (vkb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNulty v. Glorioso et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ned Charles McNulty, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted Glorioso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Security Guard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?