Mahdi v. Convergent Outsourcing Inc et al
| Yasin Mahdi |
| Convergent Outsourcing Inc., IC System Inc and Convergent Outsourcing Inc |
| 2:2022cv01184 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/10/2022. Rule 26(a) disclosures to be exchanged by 11/28/2022. Amended pleadings due by 11/30/2022. Discovery due by 6/30/2023. Dispositive motions due by 7/31/2023; Civil LR 56 response and reply deadlines apply; parties to file joint status report by 7/31/2023 if they choose not to file dispositive motion. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 13 THE PARTIES' JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by Yasin Mahdi. (Ponder, Brian) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Homes on behalf of Convergent Outsourcing Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: Justin H. Homes (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Homes, Justin) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/20/2022. Rule 26(a) Disclosures Rule 26(f) report to be exchanged filed by 11/10/2022. (cc: all counsel)(cb) Modified on 10/25/2022 (cb).
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by IC System Inc of Pendency of Other Actions (Golden, Dale) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE by IC System Inc of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Golden, Dale) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by IC System Inc.(Golden, Dale) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Convergent Outsourcing Inc.(Terwilliger, Thomas) |
| Case reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (kah) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Yasin Mahdi. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Ponder, Brian) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to PLAINTIFF requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. (kah) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yasin Mahdi. Convergent Outsourcing Inc served on 9/8/2022. (Ponder, Brian) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yasin Mahdi. IC System Inc served on 8/30/2022. (Ponder, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L Ponder on behalf of Yasin Mahdi. Attorney(s) appearing: Plaintiff YASIN MAHDI (Ponder, Brian) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Mailed. (cmb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Convergent Outsourcing Inc. from Racine County Circuit Court, Case Number: 22-SC-2238 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4227445) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Consent, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Terwilliger, Thomas) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (cmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
