McEuens v. Leis et al
Donald McEuens |
Andy Leis, Robert Diggins, Anthony Adams, Laura Hass, Andre Griffin and Heidi Beaudoin |
2:2023cv00215 |
February 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Nancy Joseph |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SCREENING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 4/10/2023. IT IS ORDERED that McEuens' motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (Docket #2 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that McEuens has ten (10) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint consistent with this decision. Should McEuens fail to timely file an amended complaint consistent with this decision, I will recommend this action be dismissed with prejudice. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(rcm) |
Filing 4 (UNSIGNED) AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Donald McEuens.(rcm) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Donald McEuens. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (rcm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Donald McEuens. (rcm) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Donald McEuens. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. Jury Demand (rcm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.