Laplante v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
| John Laplante |
| Experian Information Solutions Inc |
| 2:2023cv00342 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/3/2023. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 7/12/2023 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 222, 517 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202 before Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Rule 26 Discovery Plan due by 6/28/2023. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE Statement by Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Salman, Tanya) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Experian Information Solutions Inc.(Salman, Tanya) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/12/2023 re #5 Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. The court GRANTS the defendants unopposed motion for an extension of time. The court ORDERS that the time for the defendant to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED until the end of the day on May 2, 2023. Note: there is no document linked to this text only order. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Salman, Tanya) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tanya M Salman on behalf of Experian Information Solutions Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: Tanya M. Salman (Salman, Tanya) |
| Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions Inc. (amb) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by John Laplante. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (DeLadurantey, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by John Laplante. (DeLadurantey, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Experian Information Solutions Inc by John Laplante. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4350103) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Experian Information Solutions Inc)(DeLadurantey, Nathan) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Laplante v. Experian Information Solutions Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Laplante | |
| Represented By: | Nathan E DeLadurantey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Inc | |
| Represented By: | Tanya M Salman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
