Boon-Bey v. Avila
Kevin Michael Boon-Bey |
Superintendent Lisa M Avila |
2:2023cv00361 |
March 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
William E Duffin |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 LETTER from Nelson E Boon-Bey and Susan B. Boon re mail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(bx) |
Filing 18 THIRD Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (bx) |
Filing 17 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (bx) |
Filing 16 REQUEST/LETTER from Nelson E Boon-Bey and Susan B. Boon re documents being returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(bx) |
Filing 15 LETTER from Kevin Michael Boon-Bey re no longer consenting to magistrate judge. (bx) |
Filing 14 RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 4/24/2023 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241 filed by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey RECOMMENDING that Boon-Bey's petition and this action be dismissed. Written objection to any recommendation herein or part thereof shall be filed within fourteen days of service of this recommendation or prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, whichever is earlier. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se Petitioner)(lz) |
Case Reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. Petitioner notified. (lz) |
Filing 13 REPLY filed by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey re #10 Court Order dated 4/13/2023. (mlm) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 4/13/2023. The petitioner's "Motion to Clarify" is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted with respect to the request for an extension of time. Within 21 days of the date of this order the petitioner shall inform the court how he wishes to proceed. The motion is denied in all other respects. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(mlm) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Clarify by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (mlm) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 4/4/2023. The court will give Boon-Bey 21 days from the date of this order to voluntarily dismiss his petition if he does not wish the court to reconstrue it as a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254. If Boon-Bey does not notify the court within 21 days of the date of this order that he wishes to voluntarily dismiss his petition, the court will construe it as arising under 28 U.S.C. 2254 and preliminarily review it in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Boon-Bey's motion to withdraw his consent to proceed before a magistrate judge is DENIED. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(mlm) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw his consent to magistrate judge by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Refusal)(mlm) |
Filing 8 REQUEST by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey for copies of the docketed petition and exhibits with the costs waived. (lz) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mlm) |
Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. Amendment to #2 Exhibits - Attachment #2. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(mlm) |
Filing 5 LETTER from the clerk to Petitioner re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Copy of docket and page 1 of docketed petition mailed to petitioner. (lz) |
Filing 4 EXHIBITS by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. Exhibits J - O (bookmarked). (lz) |
Filing 3 EXHIBITS by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. Exhibit B. (Attachments: #1 Appendix - Volume III, #2 Attachment 4 - Point 13 Gound Three (a), #3 Attachment 4 - Exhibits A-H (bookmarked), #4 Exhibit I (1-12) (bookmarked))(lz) |
Filing 2 EXHIBITS by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (bookmarked: Attachment 1 - Point 6(c); Attachment 2 - Point 13(a); Attachment 3 - Point 13 Ground Two (a); Exhibit A - Notice & Complaint of State's Obstruction of Legal Mail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B - Part 1- Supreme Court Case No 2019AP2279CR start at page 53, #2 Exhibit B - Part 2 - Supreme Court Case No 2019AP2279CR start at page 126, #3 Appendix - Volume II, #4 Exhibit A - Supreme Court Case No 2019AP2279CR start at page 62)(lz) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC Section 2241 filed by Kevin Michael Boon-Bey. (Filing Fee PAID $5) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(lz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boon-Bey v. Avila | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kevin Michael Boon-Bey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Superintendent Lisa M Avila | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.