City of Milwaukee v. Hyundai Motor America et al
| City of Milwaukee |
| Hyundai Motor America, Kia America, Inc and Kia America Inc |
| 2:2023cv00376 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Extension of Time (Unopposed) by Hyundai Motor America, Kia America Inc. (Manna, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE Statement by Hyundai Motor America, Kia America Inc. (Manna, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel A Manna on behalf of Hyundai Motor America, Kia America Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: Daniel A. Manna (Manna, Daniel) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 4/14/2023. In light of #7 Defendants' unopposed motion to extend deadlines in this case, the motion is GRANTED as follows. If Defendants file a Motion to Vacate the Conditional Transfer Order in MDL No. 3052 and such motion is granted, Defendants' responsive pleading in this matter shall be due within thirty (30) days of entry of the order in MDL No. 3052. Defendants' request that the Court extend the parties' deadline to propose a schedule for holding for a Rule 26(f) conference, initial disclosures, and a discovery plan is granted subject to the following. The parties are advised that this branch of the Court typically does not hold scheduling conferences, instead requiring the parties to jointly prepare and submit a Rule 26(f) plan within two weeks of when all named parties have appeared, after which the Court issues a trial scheduling order. The Court also does not set discovery-related deadlines in its trial scheduling orders, instead generally leaving it to the parties to manage discovery consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this district's Local Rules, and their own stipulations. In other words, the deadlines for these discovery-related requirements may be obviated if this case proceeds in this Court. Further details will be laid out in a pretrial protocols order, which will issue in this action if the Defendants' above-referenced motion is granted and the action continues in this Court. (cc: all counsel) (cw)
|
| Case Reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph no longer assigned to the case. (edr) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by City of Milwaukee. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Sarko, Lynn) |
| Summons Issued as to Hyundai Motor America, Kia America Inc. (edr) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by City of Milwaukee (Sarko, Lynn) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by City of Milwaukee (Sarko, Lynn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Hyundai Motor America, Kia America, Inc by City of Milwaukee. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4357105) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Hyundai Motor America, #3 Summons Kia America, Inc.)(Sarko, Lynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
