GS Holistic LLC v. Smoke World Inc et al
GS Holistic, LLC and GS Holistic LLC |
SMOKE WORLD INC doing business as SMOKE WORLD VAPE 3 and ANAN BARBARAWI |
2:2023cv00703 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic LLC. Anan Barbarawi served on 7/6/2023. (Fojo, Ryan) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic LLC. Smoke World Inc served on 7/6/2023. (Fojo, Ryan) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (mlm) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by GS Holistic LLC. (Fojo, Ryan) |
Summons Issued as to Anan Barbarawi, Smoke World Inc. (mlm) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (amh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by GS Holistic, LLC. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4415972) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Fojo, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.