Mims v. Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc
Davita Mims |
Advocate Aurora Healthcare, Inc. and Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc |
2:2023cv00942 |
July 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/30/2023. Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 10/2/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2023. Plaintiffs Expert Witness List due by 12/1/2023. Defendants Expert Witness List due by 2/2/2024. Discovery due by 5/3/2024. Summary Judgment Motions due by 6/21/2024. The court will schedule a telephonic scheduling conference to discuss further scheduling if no summary judgment motions are filed or if resolution of the summary judgment motions does not dispose of the case in its entirety. (cc: all counsel)(lz) |
Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William E Duffin: Rule 16 Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 8/30/2023. Case deadlines set. Scheduling order to be entered. (Tape #Zoom audio 9:33-9:39 am) (lz) |
Filing 14 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by All Defendants. (Pastrana, Carlos) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/30/2023 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. The parties shall call the court's conference line at 669-254-5252. When prompted, use meeting ID 160 9647 6949# and # again and then enter passcode 943682# to join the call. A Rule 26(f) report shall be electronically filed no later than 8/24/2023. (cc: all counsel)(lz) |
Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 8/9/2023. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin for all further proceedings. Judge J P Stadtmueller no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jm) |
Filing 11 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Defendants. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pastrana, Carlos) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE Statement by All Defendants. (Pastrana, Carlos) |
Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by All Defendants.(Pastrana, Carlos) |
NOTICE from the clerk to DEFENDANT requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge William Duffin be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. In addition, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement should have been filed with your first pleading. Please file your disclosure statement within 7 days. (rcm) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Warren E Buliox on behalf of All Defendants. Attorney(s) appearing: Warren. E Buliox (Buliox, Warren) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Carlos R Pastrana on behalf of All Defendants. (Pastrana, Carlos) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Davita Mims. Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc served on 7/14/2023. (Phebus, Douglas) |
NOTICE of Electronic Filing Error re #5 Acceptance of Service by Milwaukee County,,, Admission of Service,,, Non-Acceptance of Service Under Memorandum of Understanding,,, Request for Issuance of Summons,,, Return of Service by Certified Mail,, filed by Davita Mims ; The incorrect event was chosen. Please use the Summons Returned Executed event, and only that event, when filing proof of service of the summons and complaint in an action; Please refer to the policies and procedures for electronic case filing and the user manual found at www.wied.uscourts.gov (rcm) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Davita Mims. Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc served on 7/14/2023 . ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY MILWAUKEE COUNTY as to Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc, ADMISSION OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint on Summons and ComplaintJuly 14, 2023 by Advocate Aurora Healthcare, Inc.Advocate Aurora Healthcare, Inc., NON-ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE Under Memorandum of Understanding as to Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc, REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Davita Mims, Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail by Davita Mims served upon Advocate Aurora Healthcare, Inc.Advocate Aurora Healthcare, Inc. on Summons and ComplaintJuly 14, 2023 (Phebus, Douglas) Modified on 7/17/2023 (rcm). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas J Phebus on behalf of Davita Mims. Attorney(s) appearing: Victor M. Arellano (Phebus, Douglas) |
Filing 3 PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 7/14/2023. Judge Stadtmueller has adopted revised procedures for civil cases. Counsel for all parties should carefully review this Order and may contact chambers if they have any questions about the matters addressed herein. (cc: all counsel) (ats) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Davita Mims. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Phebus, Douglas) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Summons Issued as to Advocate Aurora Healthcare Inc. (bx) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Advocate Aurora Healthcare, Inc. by Davita Mims. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4448684) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1)(Phebus, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.