Sellers v. Thompson et al
Plaintiff: Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant: Tracy L Thompson, Julie Ludwig, Kelly Pelky and Hannah Utter
Case Number: 2:2023cv01014
Filed: July 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/8/2023 GRANTING #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee with Release Account Funds. By 9/29/2023, Plaintiff shall SUBMIT a six-month certified trust account statement. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Kendrik Dane Sellers at Redgranite Correctional Institution)(jm)
August 7, 2023 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kendrick Dane Sellers. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (bx)
July 31, 2023 Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Kendrick Dane Sellers re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (rcm)
July 28, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Utilize Release Account to Pay IPFF by Kendrick Dane Sellers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter to Clerk)(rcm)
July 28, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Kendrick Dane Sellers. (rcm)
July 28, 2023 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by Kendrick Dane Sellers. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(rcm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sellers v. Thompson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendrick Dane Sellers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy L Thompson
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie Ludwig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Pelky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hannah Utter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?