Al Bhadely v. Jaddou et al
| Hamed K Al Bhadely |
| Ur M Jaddou, Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri Robinson and John Pruhs |
| 2:2023cv01055 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Hamed K Al Bhadely. (Layde, Kevin) |
| SECOND NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF - Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement should have been filed with your first pleading. Please file your disclosure statement within 7 days (rcm) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Hamed K Al Bhadely. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Layde, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Hamed K Al Bhadely. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4470069) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Layde, Kevin) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (amh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
