Barrell v. Gierach
Lazaro Barrell and Lazaro Borrell |
Warden Michael Gierach |
2:2023cv01081 |
August 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sonya K Bice on behalf of Michael Gierach. Attorney(s) appearing: Sonya K. Bice (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Bice, Sonya) |
Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Michael Gierach (Collins, Winn) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/8/2023. Respondent to file answer or other responsive pleading to petition within 60 days. See order for briefing schedule and allowable page lengths. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Lazaro Borrell)(cb) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Lazaro Barrell. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(edr) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Petitioner re signature and Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Signature page of #1 Petition included. (edr) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lazaro Barrell. (Filing Fee PAID $5, receipt #93155) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(edr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.