Prude v. Erpenbach et al
Terrance Prude |
Jon Erpenbach, Kevin Carr and Angela Hansen |
2:2023cv01473 |
November 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Terrance Prude. Case terminated. (mac) |
Filing 3 SECOND LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (mlm) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the Clerk to Terrance Prude re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (kwf) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against Jon Erpenbach, Kevin Carr, and Angela Hansen by Terrance Prude. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Cover Letter) (kwf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.