Winstanley v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Roger F. Winstanley |
Progress Software Corporation and Medical College of Wisconsin |
2:2023cv01729 |
December 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-25) transferring this action to USDC for the District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. (cc: all counsel)(mlm) |
Case Electronically Transmitted to the USDC District of Massachusetts on 1/24/2024. (mlm) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants (vkb) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Stephen Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (mew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Medical College of Wisconsin, Progress Software Corporation by Roger F. Winstanley. ( Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4572974) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Winstanley Notice Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Lyon, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.