Rivera-Santiago v. Isaih et al
Vicente Rivera-Santiago |
Andrade Isaih and John Doe |
2:2024cv00031 |
January 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/7/2024. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that, under the informal service agreement, that defendant shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within 60 days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect from plaintiff's prison trust account the $348.32 balance of the filing fee by collecting payments from plaintiff prison trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding months income credited to the account in any month in which either (1) the balance in the account exceeds $10 or (2) the income credited to the account in the preceding month exceeded $10. Additional details in order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party with pro se guide and officer in charge)(amh) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $1.68, Receipt Number: MK 94868 ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department. (jcl) |
Filing 9 LETTER from Vicente Rivera-Santiago re filing fee and copies. (Attachments: #1 Information Request, #2 Disbursement Request, #3 Envelope)(ams) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/13/2024. IT IS ORDERED that on or before March 5, 2024, plaintiff must submit the $1.68 initial partial filing fee to the Clerk of Court or advise the court in writing why he is not able to submit the assessed amount. If plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payment or show cause for failure to do so by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel and financial and mailed to pro se party and officer in charge)(amh) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Vicente Rivera-Santiago. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mew) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/10/2024. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff is assessed $1.68 as an initial partial payment of the $350.00 fee for filing this case. On or before February 5, 2024, the plaintiff must submit a check or money order made payable to the Clerk of Court in the amount of $1.68 or advise the court in writing why the plaintiff is not able to submit the assessed amount. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if by February 5, 2024, the plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payment or show cause for failure to do so, this case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and officer in charge)(amh) |
Filing 5 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Mailed. (cmb) |
Filing 4 EXHIBITS by Vicente Rivera-Santiago. (cmb) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Vicente Rivera-Santiago. (cmb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Vicente Rivera-Santiago. (cmb) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with jury demand filed against John Doe, Andrade Isaih by Vicente Rivera-Santiago. (cmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.