Flak v. Veltus et al
| Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr |
| Brandon Veltus, Kimberly Loehrke, William T Jeronimo and Kurtis D Brown |
| 2:2024cv00115 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $3.33, Receipt Number: MK 95103 ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department. (ams) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Letters) (kwf) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Michael Lawrenz. (kwf) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Daniel Flak Jr. (kwf) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons) (kwf) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/27/2024. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is assessed $3.33 as an initial partial payment of the $350.00 fee for filing this case. On or before March 19, 2024 plaintiff must submit a check or money order made payable to the Clerk of Court in the amount of $3.33. If plaintiff encounters challenges in requesting payment from his account or is otherwise not able to submit the assessed amount, he must notify the court before the deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if by March 19, 2024, plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payment or show cause for failure to do so, the court will deny his motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and will dismiss this action based on plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and officer in charge)(amh)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (jmk) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jmk) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/23/2024. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that by March 15, 2024 plaintiff must file a signed and completed magistrate judge consent form and a certified copy of his institutional trust account statement for the six months before he filed this lawsuit. Plaintiff alternatively may submit a letter explaining why he is unable to file these documents. If plaintiff does not file his missing documents or explain why he cannot by March 15, 2024, I will dismiss his case without further notice for his failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party with additional copy of consent form)(amh)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Exhibit - Incident Report)(mac) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the Clerk to Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (kwf) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (kwf) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Jurisdiction and Relief, #2 Offender Request for DOJ Certification) (Note: Complaint appears to be missing pages 3, 4, and 5.) (kwf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
