Davis v. Boughton
| Demoyne Davis |
| Gary Boughton |
| 2:2024cv00161 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Gary Boughton Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Judgment of Conviction, #2 Ex. 2 - Court of Appeals Briefs, #3 Ex. 3 - Ct. App. Decision Affirming, #4 Ex. 4 - Petition for Review, Response, and Order Denying, #5 Ex. 5 - TRANSCRIPT - Further Proceedings 3-27-18, #6 Ex. 6 - TRANSCRIPT - Motion to Withdraw 6-22-18, #7 Ex. 7 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-04-19 p.m., #8 Ex. 8 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-05-19 a.m., #9 Ex. 9 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-05-19 p.m., #10 Ex. 10 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-06-19 a.m., #11 Ex. 11 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-06-19 p.m., #12 Ex. 12 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-07-19 a.m., #13 Ex. 13 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-07-19 p.m., #14 Ex. 14 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-08-19 a.m., #15 Ex. 15 - TRANSCRIPT - Jury Trial 2-08-19 p.m., #16 Ex. 16 - TRANSCRIPT - Sentencing Hearing 3-22-19, #17 Certificate of Service)(Conway, Michael) |
| Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (rcm) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Gary Boughton. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Conway, Michael) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to RESPONDENT requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. (rcm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J Conway on behalf of Gary Boughton. Attorney(s) appearing: Michael J. Conway (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Conway, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Demoyne Davis. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (rcm) |
| Filing 4 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Gary Boughton (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Vandermeuse, Jennifer) |
Filing 3
RULE 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 2/14/2024. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a copy of Davis' petition and this order shall be served upon the respondent by service upon the State of Wisconsin Attorney General. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the respondent is directed to serve and file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition, complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, within SIXTY (60) days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT unless the respondent files a dispositive motion in lieu of an answer, the parties shall abide by the following schedule regarding the filing of briefs on the merits of the petitioners claim: 1. The petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days following the filing of the respondent's answer within which to file his brief in support of his petition; 2. The respondent shall have forty-five (45) days following the filing of the petitioner's brief within which to file a brief in opposition. If petitioner does not file a brief, the respondent has forty-five (45) days from the due date of the petitioner's brief to file his brief; and 3. The petitioner shall have thirty (30) days following the filing of the respondent's opposition brief within which to file a reply brief, if any. In the event that respondent files a dispositive motion and supporting brief in lieu of an answer, this briefing schedule will be suspended and the briefing schedule will be as follows: 1. The petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days following the filing of the respondent's dispositive motion and supporting initial brief within which to file a brief in opposition; 2. The respondent shall have thirty (30) days following the filing of the petitioner's opposition brief within which to file a reply brief, if any. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(rcm)
|
| Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Demoyne Davis re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (ams) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/14/2024: #1 E-Filing Notice) (ams). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Demoyne Davis. (Filing Fee PAID $5 Rcpt. No. MK94692) (Attachments: #1 Attorney Statement, #2 Exhibits)(ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Boughton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Demoyne Davis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Gary Boughton | |
| Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas |
| Represented By: | Michael J Conway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
