Miller v. O'Malley
| Lewis Miller, Jr. and Lewis Miller, Jr |
| Martin J O'Malley |
| 2:2024cv00256 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Filing Administrative Transcript and Preservation of Rights filed by Martin J O'Malley. (Attachments: #1 Transcript) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Social Security Transcript by Martin J O'Malley (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk, and approved as to form by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. (cc: all counsel)(asc) |
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin granting #9 Stipulated Motion for Remand. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Agency pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings and that judgment be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (cc: all counsel)(asc)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) by Martin J O'Malley. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Yarnell, Eric) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Martin J O'Malley filed by Lewis Miller, Jr.(Brzezinski, James) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Charles Yarnell on behalf of Martin J O'Malley. Attorney(s) appearing: Eric Yarnell (Yarnell, Eric) |
| Filing 6 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 4/29/2024;Plaintiff's brief due 5/29/2024;Defendant's response due 6/28/2024;Plaintiff's reply due 7/12/2024. (cc: all counsel) (asc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/28/2024. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Lewis Miller, Jr. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Brzezinski, James) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Lewis Miller, Jr. (Brzezinski, James) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Martin J O'Malley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge William Duffin to be filed within 21 days. The consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (mew) |
| Notice of Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has electronically notified via CM/ECF the Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. (asc) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Lewis Miller, Jr ( Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4619461) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brzezinski, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
