Hughes v. McDermott

Petitioner: Etter L Hughes
Respondent: Warden Jennifer McDermott
Case Number: 2:2024cv00270
Filed: February 29, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Referring Judge: William E Duffin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2024 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jennifer McDermott. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Kumfer, Lisa)
March 26, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa E Kumfer on behalf of Jennifer McDermott. Attorney(s) appearing: Lisa E.F. Kumfer (Kumfer, Lisa)
March 26, 2024 Case Reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (lz)
March 25, 2024 Filing 4 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Jennifer McDermott (Vandermeuse, Jennifer)
March 22, 2024 Filing 3 RULE 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 3/22/2024 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Etter L Hughes. No later than 60 days after this order, the respondent shall answer the petition in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The petitioner shall then submit a brief in support of his petition no later than 28 days thereafter. The respondent shall submit a brief in opposition no later than 28 days thereafter. The petitioner may reply no later than 21 days thereafter. Alternatively, the respondent may move to dismiss the petitioner's petition no later than 60 days after this order. In the event the respondent moves to dismiss the petition, the petitioner shall respond to that motion no later than 28 days thereafter. The respondent may then reply no later than 28 days thereafter. (cc: all counsel)(lz)
March 5, 2024 Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Etter L Hughes. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Masnica, Nicole)
February 29, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Etter L Hughes. ( Filing Fee PAID $5 receipt number AWIEDC-4622289) (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Information, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Masnica, Nicole) Modified on 2/29/2024 (lz).
February 29, 2024 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge William Duffin to be filed within 21 days. The consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (mew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. McDermott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Etter L Hughes
Represented By: Nicole M Masnica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Jennifer McDermott
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Represented By: Lisa E Kumfer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?