Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Roy N. Cook, Jeffrey A. Natrop, Peter S. Renner, James Rudolph and Peter Williams |
2:2024cv00313 |
March 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Brett H Ludwig |
Securities/Commodities |
12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Unopposed MOTION for Settlement Unopposed Motion for Entry of Consent Judgments by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Signed Consent by Defendant Cook, #2 Signed Consent by Defendant Natrop, #3 Signed Consent by Defendant Renner, #4 Signed Consent by Defendant Rudolph, #5 Signed Consent by Defendant Williams, #6 Text of Proposed Order Cook Proposed Final Judgment, #7 Text of Proposed Order Natrop Proposed Final Judgment, #8 Text of Proposed Order Renner Proposed Final Judgment, #9 Text of Proposed Order Rudolph Proposed Final Judgment, #10 Text of Proposed Order Williams Proposed Final Judgment)(Conway, Dean) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Securities and Exchange Commission by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Conway, Dean) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Brett H Ludwig. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Stephen Dries to be filed within 21 days. The consent/refusal form is available #here. (mew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.