Richmond v. American Express et al
| Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr |
| American Express, Christopher LeCaillec and Paul Sykes |
| 2:2024cv00329 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER from the clerk to Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a complete six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (ams) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr. (ams) |
| Filing 4 BLANK Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Information Sheet)(ams) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr in support of #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (ams) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr. (ams) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against American Express, Christopher LeCaillec, Paul Sykes by Nathaniel J Richmond, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Authorization, #2 Envelope)(ams) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/18/2024: #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (ams). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
