Rodriguez v. Lancaster Grant County Child Support Agency et al
| Victor S Rodriguez |
| Lancaster Grant County Child Support Agency and Mianna T Barner |
| 2:2024cv00332 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Victor S Rodriguez. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Victor S Rodriguez. (mew) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Requesting to Have the United States Marshal Office Serve the Defendants by Victor S Rodriguez. (mew) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT and EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary and Permanent Injunction filed by Victor S Rodriguez. (mew) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT and EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary and Permanent Injunction filed by Victor S Rodriguez. (mew) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Lancaster Grant County Child Support Agency and Mianna T Barner filed by Victor S Rodriguez. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries. (mew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
