Jerome v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
| Olajide Sunday Jerome |
| US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Kenneth Madsen |
| 2:2024cv00475 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Plaintiffs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chadwick, Theodore) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Olajide Sunday Jerome. ( Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4659914) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Chadwick, Theodore) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
