Simmons v. Gierach
Tiffany Lynn Simmons |
Warden Michael Gierach |
2:2024cv00796 |
June 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 BRIEF in Support filed by Michael Gierach re #9 MOTION to Dismiss . (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Held, Eliot) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Michael Gierach. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Held, Eliot) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Michael Gierach. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Held, Eliot) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Eliot M Held on behalf of Michael Gierach. Attorney(s) appearing: Eliot M. Held (Held, Eliot) |
Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (lz) |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to John Noble (Vandermeuse, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 RULE 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 7/22/2024 DISMISSING AS MOOT #2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The filing fee has been paid. No later than 60 days after this order, the respondent shall answer the petition in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Petitioner shall then submit a brief in support of her petition no later than 28 days thereafter. The respondent shall submit a brief in opposition no later than 28 days thereafter. Petitioner may reply no later than 21 days thereafter. Alternatively, the respondent may move to dismiss Petitioner's petition no later than 60 days after this order. In the event the respondent moves to dismiss the petition, Petitioner shall respond to that motion no later than 28 days thereafter. The respondent may then reply no later than 28 days thereafter. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se Petitioner with Habeas Corpus guide)(lz) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Tiffany Lynn Simmons. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lz) |
Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Petitioner re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (mlm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Tiffany Lynn Simmons. (mlm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tiffany Lynn Simmons. (Filing Fee PAID $5; Receipt # 95895) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Simmons v. Gierach | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Tiffany Lynn Simmons | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Michael Gierach | |
Represented By: | Eliot M Held |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.