Rach v. Ratzburg et al
Kyle Rach |
James E McGinnis, Michael G Gierach and Jeffrey J Ratzburg |
2:2024cv01046 |
August 19, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kyle Rach. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(amb) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kyle Rach. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(amb) |
Filing 6 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (amb) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Kyle Rach. (amb) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Cody Carlson filed by Kyle Rach. (amb) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Dustin Harwick filed by Kyle Rach. (amb) |
Filing 2 REQUEST by Kyle Rach for discovery. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(amb) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury demand filed against All Defendants by Kyle Rach. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.