Townsend v. O'Malley
Candice Marie Townsend |
Martin J O'Malley |
2:2024cv01109 |
August 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Candice Marie Townsend. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Angermeier, Vincent) |
Filing 6 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 11/4/2024;Plaintiff's brief due 12/4/2024;Defendant's response due 1/3/2025;Plaintiff's reply due 1/17/2025. (cc: all counsel) (cb) |
Notice of Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has electronically notified via CM/ECF the Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. (amb) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Martin J O'Malley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/3/2024 GRANTING #2 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: Added Martin J O'Malley as the correct defendant and removed duplicate text in attachment to complaint. Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance. (amb) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Candice Marie Townsend. (Angermeier, Vincent) |
Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Candice Marie Townsend. (Angermeier, Vincent) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Candice Marie Townsend (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Angermeier, Vincent) Modified on 9/3/2024 (amb). |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper: Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Townsend v. O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Candice Marie Townsend | |
Represented By: | Vincent R Angermeier |
Represented By: | Robert C Angermeier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin J O'Malley | |
Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
Represented By: | SSA - Office of the General Counsel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.