Derosario v. Leap For Legacy LLC et al
| Joseph Derosario |
| Jack Tonnessen and Leap For Legacy LLC |
| 2:2024cv01303 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reassigned to Judge Brett H Ludwig. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph no longer assigned to the case. (rcm) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (rcm) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Joseph Derosario. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott S Luzi on behalf of Joseph Derosario. Attorney(s) appearing: Scott S. Luzi, James A. Walcheske, David M. Potteiger (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Joseph Derosario. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Leap For Legacy LLC, Jack Tonnessen by Joseph Derosario. ( Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4792895) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Leap For Legacy LLC, #3 Summons - Jack Tonnessen)(Luzi, Scott) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (mew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
