Haarsma v. Robins
Plaintiff: Ronald A. Haarsma
Defendant: Timothy Robins doing business as ChampionshipRings.net
Case Number: 2:2024cv01494
Filed: November 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Timothy Robins by Ronald A. Haarsma. ( Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4821072) (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Invoice from ChampionshipRings, #2 Ex. B - Consignment Agreement, #3 Ex. C - Declaration of Timothy Robins, #4 Ex. D - Robins' Response, #5 Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Law, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haarsma v. Robins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Robins doing business as ChampionshipRings.net
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald A. Haarsma
Represented By: James N Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?