Stephens v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Plaintiff: Raviah Stephens
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC
Case Number: 2:2026cv00607
Filed: April 9, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2026 Filing 9 TRANSMIT Amended Complaint, Order, Summons, and MJ form to USMS for service. (jm)
May 29, 2026 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services LLC. (jm)
May 28, 2026 Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Unexecuted as to Equifax Information Services LLC (jm)
April 27, 2026 Filing 7 TRANSMIT Amended Complaint, Order, Notice, Waiver and MJ form to USMS for service upon defendant, Equifax Information Services LLC. (jm) (Main Document 7 replaced with corrections and resent to USMS on 4/27/2026) (jm).
April 24, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 4/23/2026. Based on Plaintiffs #5 Amended Complaint that corrected the deficiencies and sufficiently alleged his claims to put Defendant on notice, the amended complaint will be allowed to proceed. It is further ordered that the USMS shall serve a copy of the Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 5, and this Order upon Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The Defendant shall file a responsive pleading to the amended complaint within the time allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
April 20, 2026 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Equifax Information Services LLC filed by Raviah Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(jm)
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 4/13/2026. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (Dkt. No. #2 ) is GRANTED, but the complaint (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Stephens will be given leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
April 9, 2026 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Raviah Stephens. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jm)
April 9, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Raviah Stephens. (jm)
April 9, 2026 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Equifax Information Services LLC filed by Raviah Stephens. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephens v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raviah Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?