Martinez v. Haynes et al
| Vincent Martinez |
| Nathan Haynes, Nicholas Redeker, Clinton F Bryant and Shannon Butcher |
| 2:2026cv00708 |
| April 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 BRIEF in Support filed by Vincent Martinez re #12 MOTIONS. (nf) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #8 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment, AND/OR MOTION to Supplement #8 MOTION with a Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Vincent Martinez. (nf) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Vincent Martinez re #9 Order. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(nf) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clinton F Bryant, Shannon Butcher, Nathan Haynes, Nicholas Redeker filed by Vincent Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Request to Amend Complaint, #3 Exhibits - Institution Reports, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Envelope)(nf) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 05/13/2026. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Martinez shall file a document with the Court by June 2, 2026 clarifying whether he wishes to convert this lawsuit into a multi-plaintiff lawsuit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff Martinez wishes to convert this lawsuit into a multi-plaintiff lawsuit, he and inmate Hill must file a copy of the complaint signed by both individuals by June 2, 2026. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff Martinez wishes to convert this lawsuit into a multi-plaintiff lawsuit, inmate Hill must either submit the $405.00 civil case filing fee in full or file a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, along with a six-month certified trust account statement by June 2, 2026. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(bx)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment by Vincent Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(nf) |
| Filing 7 LETTER from Robert Hill re request to join the case as a plaintiff and fellow inmate of Vincent Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(nf) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Vincent Martinez. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nf) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/27/2026. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to use his release account to pay the full $405 filing fee (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED. Details in order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party at John C Burke Correctional Center)(amh)
|
| FILING FEE Received: $405.00, receipt number 101688. (cmb) Modified on 4/27/2026 to correct receipt.(cmb). |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (nf) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Use Release Account to Pay Full $405 Filing Fee by Vincent Martinez. (nf) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Vincent Martinez. (nf) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Clinton F Bryant, Shannon Butcher, Nathan Haynes, Nicholas Redeker by Vincent Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit 1 - 9, #3 Envelope)(nf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
