Ortiz, Gregory v. Huibregtse, Peter et al
| Gregory S. Ortiz |
| Peter Huibregtse, Daniel Westfield, Brian Kool, Sarah Mason, Christine Beerkicher, Cook, "Jane" Walters, William Pollard, Peter Ericksson, Christopher Stevens, Brandt, Kevin Stutleen, Sarah Merlin, Michael Delvaux, Lesatz and "John" Swiekatowski |
| 3:2011cv00195 |
| March 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER that defendants have until March 27, 2013 to advise whether they agree to a dismissal of the claims without prejudice. If defendants do not agree to such a dismissal, plaintiff may have until April 5, 2013, in which to (a) withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal and file his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment; or (b) advise the court that he has no objection to a dismissal with prejudice. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/20/2013. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 11.55 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 4/11/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/21/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
