Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carrington v. Hazlitt et al
as 5:2026ct03182
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Braden Hazlitt, Katie Cook, Genna Petre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Valentin v. County of Cook, Illinois et al
as 1:2026cv07354
Plaintiff:
Antonio Luis Valentin
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois and Salazar
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Augustave et al
as 2:2026cv14219
Plaintiff:
Tafari Dickson
Defendant:
Sgt. F. Augustave and Officer N. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Duren Cooke v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07370
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Duren Cooke
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC,
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Cook
as 26-4012
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID LEIGH COOK, SR.
Haywood v. Repard et al
as 4:2026cv01716
Plaintiff:
Lamont Haywood
Defendant:
Robert L. Repard, Jeffrey L. Mensch, Officer Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Cooks v. USA
as 5:2026cv01527
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald Eugene Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
COOK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv01348
Plaintiff:
DONAVAN J. COOK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
