Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McCullough v. Craven County Detention Center et al
as 5:2026ct03243
Plaintiff:
Brittany McCullough and Brittany Latrina McCullough
Defendant:
Craven County Detention Center, Pamlico County Detention Center, Sheriff Chris Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2026cv09412
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Jackson
Defendant:
Cook County, Micheal Leonard and Keith Voslier
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Klamath County et al
as 1:2026cv01642
Plaintiff:
Victor Warren Stevenson
Defendant:
Klamath County, Sheriff Chris Kaber, Roger Cummins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cowles et al v. 7-Eleven Inc
as 3:2026cv02576
Plaintiff:
Linda Cowles and Paris Cook
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Edwards et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv09302
Plaintiff:
Richard Edwards and Michael Henry
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County State Attorney, Globaltellink and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cook
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stancil v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv09312
Plaintiff:
John Paul Stancil
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Ilinois, Cook County Department of Corrections and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
