Kabele, Lisa v. Berryhill, Nancy
| Lisa Ann Kabele |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 3:2012cv00776 |
| October 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Sauk |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER that the decision of defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying plaintiff Lisa Kabele's application for disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment for defendant. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/15/2020. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that plaintiff Lisa Ann Kabele may have until 4/17/17 to submit brief in support of her claim that she is entitled to receive disability benefits. The government may have until 6/1/17 to submit response brief. Plaintiff may have until 6/16/17 to submit reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/29/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Renewed Motion for Relief from an Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The clerk of court is directed to administratively close this case pending resolution of administrative proceedings. The Commissioner is directed to provide the court status updates as detailed within this order. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/4/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER that the supplemental administrative record is now due by September 16, 2016. Any briefing is STAYED pending further order of the court. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/14/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER that the decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Kabele Lisa Kabele's application for disability benefits is REMANDED under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further evidentiary gathering consistent with this opinion. Because the remand is ordered pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case, but NOT to enter judgment for Kabele.7 Instead, the case is to be administrativ ely closed and reopened, if necessary, after the ALJ's review of the newly admitted evidence. The Commissioner is also DIRECTED to provide a status report quarterly as to whether the ALJ has made a decision on benefits. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/27/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kabele, Lisa v. Berryhill, Nancy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lisa Ann Kabele | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Represented By: | Commissioner of Social Security |
| Represented By: | Richard Davis Humphrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
