Rainey, Kelly v. Tegels, L. et al
| Kelly Rainey |
| L. Tegels, Martin, Kostohryz, Maassen and HSU Nursing Staff |
| 3:2017cv00005 |
| January 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendant dismissing the case. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER that plaintiff Kelly Rainey's deadline to file a response to defendant's proposed findings of fact and opposition brief is January 3, 2020, and defendants' reply is due January 13, 2020. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/13/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER that counsel for defendant W. Bradford Martin may have until, November 1, 2019, to serve the proper person with notice of death or show cause why they are unable to do so. Once counsel files proof of service, plaintiff will have 90 days to file a motion for substitution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/16/2019. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 0.73 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 1/26/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/5/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
