Ammerman, Paul v. Singleton et al
| Paul D. Ammerman |
| Singleton, Murphy, Crapster, Larry Fuchs and Sika |
| 3:2017cv00193 |
| March 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order, Judgment and Docket Sheet to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 91 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Order, # 2 Judgment, # 3 Docket Sheet) (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
90
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the case. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER that 21 motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order remains denied and additional filings related to it should be made in Case No. 17-cv-800-wmc, denying as moot 47 Motion for Clarification, denying 37 Motio n for the forfeiture of defense's counsel rights, denying 52 Motion for Sanctions, denying 55 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel, denying 59 Motion for Finding of Contempt of Court, and denying 63 Motion for the chance to reply to defense's response to the contempt motion. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/26/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying plaintiff's 50 motion for access to release account. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/2/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
